Skip to main content

Table 4 Assessment of *quality of studies included in the systematic review

From: Rapid Eye Movement (REM) rebound on initial exposure to CPAP therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study author

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Brillante et al.

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Koo et al.

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Kushida et al.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yaegashi et al.

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Osuna et al.

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Drake et al.

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Verma et al.

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Randerath et al.

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Parrino et al.

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Collard et al.

No

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yamashiro et al.

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Lamphere et al.

No

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Aldrich et al.

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Issa et al.

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

  1. *Quality assessment of the included studies checklist from questions from National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) 1–8:
  2. 1) Case series collected in more than one center?
  3. 2) Is the hypothesis/aim/objective of the study clearly described?
  4. 3) Are the inclusion and exclusion criteria clearly reported?
  5. 4) Is there a clear definition of the outcomes reported?
  6. 5) Were data collected prospectively?
  7. 6) Is there an explicit statement that patients were recruited consecutively?
  8. 7) Are the main findings of the study clearly described?
  9. 8) Are outcomes stratified?